ProjectONE Report to the 82nd Legislature
Benefit Analysis: Quantitative Project Benefits — Financials
Category | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 | Year 6 | Year 7 | Year 8 | Year 9 | Year 10 | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agency and State Benefits | |||||||||||
Cost Savings: Improved Efficiency / Productivity | |||||||||||
Reduced IT and non-IT FTE costs including fringe benefits (Yr 3 - DIR only, Yrs 4+ - DIR & TxDOT, 3% inflation added starting yr 5) | 0 | 0 | 25,125 | 1,849,544 | 1,905,030 | 1,962,181 | 2,021,047 | 2,081,678 | 2,144,128 | 2,208,452 | 14,197,186 |
Reduced IT and non-IT contractors/consultants | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
Reduced outsourced labor costs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
Improved workflow/business processes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
Reduced error rate | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
Reduced hardware maintenance/upgrade expense (Yr 3 - DIR only, Yrs 4+ - DIR & TxDOT, 3% inflation added starting yr 5) | 0 | 0 | 21,720 | 507,357 | 522,578 | 538,255 | 554,403 | 571,035 | 588,166 | 605,811 | 3,909,324 |
Reduced software maintenance/upgrade expense (Yrs 4+ - TxDOT only, 3% inflation added starting yr 5) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 265,878 | 273,854 | 282,070 | 290,532 | 299,248 | 308,225 | 317,472 | 2,037,280 |
Reduced facilities rental/maintenance expense | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
Reduced equipment rental/supplies and materials expense | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
Subtotal Cost Savings | 0 | 0 | 46,845 | 2,622,779 | 2,701,462 | 2,782,506 | 2,865,981 | 2,951,961 | 3,040,520 | 3,131,735 | 20,143,790 |
Cost Avoidance: Compliance / Protection | |||||||||||
Avoid penalties | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
Avoid loss of funding | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
Improved enforcement actions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
Subtotal Cost Avoidance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Revenue Generation | |||||||||||
Additional revenue generated | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
Increased interest earned | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
Subtotal Revenue Generation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Quantitative Benefits (Agency/State) | 0 | 0 | 46,845 | 2,622,779 | 2,701,462 | 2,782,506 | 2,865,981 | 2,951,961 | 3,040,520 | 3,131,735 | 20,143,790 |
Cumulative Quantitative Benefits (Agency/State) | 0 | 0 | 46,845 | 2,669,624 | 5,371,086 | 8,153,593 | 11,019,574 | 13,971,535 | 17,012,055 | 20,143,790 | 20,143,790 |
Constituent (Social, Business, Environmental) Benefits | |||||||||||
Constituent: Service Delivery Savings | |||||||||||
Reduced constituent transaction costs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
Reduced service delivery cycle time | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
Increased service availability/accessibility | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
Expansion of services | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
Subtotal Service Delivery Savings | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Constituent: Regulatory Savings | |||||||||||
Reduced (paper) reporting requirements | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
Improved ability to locate regulatory requirements | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
Improved accountability/compliance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
Greater consistency in constituent/state transactions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
Subtotal Regulatory Savings | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Constituent: Other Savings | |||||||||||
Other savings (describe) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
Subtotal Other Savings | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Quantitative Benefits (Constituent) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Cumulative Quantitative Benefits (Constituent) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Note: The preceding reports detailing project benefits for the Financials component of CAPPS is provided monthly to the Quality Assurance Team as part of the quality assurance review required for all state agency technology projects in Texas. This particular report was submitted in November 2010.