Quarterly Veteran’s Report – Public Community & Junior Colleges
Texas public community and junior colleges that are not listed on this report did not report the appropriate information to the Comptroller’s office as required by Texas Government Code, Section 657.
***SENATE BILL 805 (84TH LEGISLATURE) ESTABLISHES A GOAL OF 20% VETERAN EMPLOYMENT
| QUARTER: 09/01/2020 THRU 11/30/2020 | FISCAL YEAR: 09/01/2020 THRU 11/30/2020 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JUNIOR/COMMUNITY COLLEGE | TOTAL NEW HIRES | TOTAL OTHER VET NEW HIRES | TOTAL PREF VET NEW HIRES | % OF PREF VET NEW HIRES | TOTAL STATE EMPLOYEES | TOTAL OTHER VET EMPLOYEES | TOTAL PREF VET EMPLOYEES | % OF PREF VET EMPLOYED | TOTAL VETS | % OF VETS EMPLOYED | VAR FROM 20% GOAL | COMPLAINTS RECEIVED Sept. 1, 2020 – Nov. 30, 2020 |
COMPLAINTS RESOLVED Sept. 1, 2020 – Nov. 30, 2020 |
| BLINN COLLEGE | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1173 | 58 | 15 | 1.28 | 73 | 6.22 | -13.78 | 0 | 0 |
| BRAZOSPORT COLLEGE | 38 | 0 | 4 | 10.5 | 639 | 0 | 45 | 7 | 41 | 6.4 | -13.6 | 0 | 0 |
| CENTRAL TEXAS COLLEGE | 33 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1310 | 345 | 0 | 0 | 345 | 26 | -6 | 0 | 0 |
| COLLEGE OF THE MAINLAND | 28 | 0 | 2 | 7.1 | 896 | 14 | 31 | 3.46 | 45 | 5.02 | -14.98 | 0 | 0 |
| COLLIN COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT | 140 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 2764 | 210 | 0 | 0 | 210 | 7.59 | -12.41 | 0 | 0 |
| DALLAS COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT | 330 | 0 | 6 | 1.82 | 6158 | 0 | 6 | 0.09 | 6 | 0.09 | -19.91 | 0 | 0 |
| DEL MAR COLLEGE | 47 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1129 | 209 | 0 | 0 | 209 | 18.5 | -1.49 | 0 | 0 |
| EL PASO COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2333 | 184 | 51 | 2.18 | 235 | 10.07 | -9.93 | 0 | 0 |
| GALVESTON COLLEGE | 17 | 0 | 1 | 5.88 | 279 | 0 | 25 | 8.96 | 22 | 7.89 | -12.11 | 0 | 0 |
| GRAYSON COUNTY COLLEGE | 36 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 576 | 20 | 8 | 1.4 | 28 | 4.9 | -15.1 | 0 | 0 |
| HILL COLLEGE | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 214 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2.8 | -17.2 | 0 | 0 |
| HOUSTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2470 | 145 | 24 | 1 | 169 | 6.8 | -13.2 | 0 | 0 |
| HOWARD COLLEGE | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 475 | 17 | 3 | 0.63 | 20 | 4.2 | -15.8 | 0 | 0 |
| KILGORE COLLEGE | 53 | 2 | 1 | 1.8 | 542 | 25 | 5 | 1 | 30 | 5.5 | -14.5 | 0 | 0 |
| LAREDO COLLEGE | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 820 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 3.66 | -16.34 | 0 | 0 |
| LEE JUNIOR COLLEGE | 14 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 417 | 11 | 12 | 3 | 23 | 6 | -14 | 0 | 0 |
| LONE STAR COLLEGE SYSTEM DISTRICT | 72 | 0 | 10 | 13.88 | 6769 | 0 | 533 | 7.87 | 513 | 7.57 | -12.43 | 0 | 0 |
| MCLENNAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE | 15 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 870 | 73 | 40 | 4.6 | 113 | 12.98 | -7.02 | 0 | 0 |
| MIDLAND COLLEGE DISTRICT | 57 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 755 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 3.97 | -16.03 | 0 | 0 |
| PANOLA COLLEGE | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 286 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 5.24 | -14.76 | 0 | 0 |
| PARIS JUNIOR COLLEGE | 30 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 353 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 7 | -13 | 0 | 0 |
| SAN JACINTO COLLEGE | 40 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 2637 | 0 | 201 | 7.6 | 201 | 7.6 | -12.4 | 0 | 0 |
| TEMPLE COLLEGE | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 422 | 28 | 4 | 0.95 | 32 | 7.6 | -12.4 | 0 | 0 |
| TEXARKANA COLLEGE | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 355 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 7.1 | -12.9 | 0 | 0 |
| TYLER JUNIOR COLLEGE | 40 | 0 | 1 | 2.5 | 985 | 33 | 20 | 2 | 53 | 5.4 | -14.6 | 0 | 0 |
| VERNON REGIONAL JUNIOR COLLEGE | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 228 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 6 | -14 | 0 | 0 |
| VICTORIA COLLEGE | 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 511 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 7.8 | -12.2 | 0 | 0 |
| WEATHERFORD JUNIOR COLLEGE | 37 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 682 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 3.7 | -17 | 0 | 0 |
| WHARTON COUNTY JUNIOR COLLEGE | 28 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 806 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 3.97 | -16.03 | 0 | 0 |
| TOTAL NEW HIRES | Employees hired during report period. |
|---|---|
| TOTAL OTHER VET NEW HIRES | Total employees hired during report period reported as veterans but not eligible for veteran preference. |
| TOTAL PREF VET NEW HIRES | Total employees hired during report period reported as eligible for veteran preference including Surviving Spouses and Orphans of Veterans. |
| % OF PREF VET NEW HIRES | Percentage of new hire employees hired during report period reported as eligible for preference including Surviving Spouses and Orphans of Veterans. |
| TOTAL STATE EMPLOYEES | Total Employees. |
|---|---|
| TOTAL OTHER VET EMPLOYEES | Total agency employees who are veterans but reported as not eligible for veteran preference. |
| TOTAL PREF VET EMPLOYEES | Total employees reported as eligible for veteran preference including Surviving Spouses and Orphans of Veterans. |
| % OF PREF VET EMPLOYEES | Percentage of employees reported as eligible for veteran preference including Surviving Spouses and Orphans of Veterans. |
| TOTAL VETS | Total of those reported as Other Vet Employees and Total Pref. Vet Employees but does not include those reported as Surviving Spouses and Orphans of Veterans. |
| % OF VETS EMPLOYED | Total % of those reported as Other Vet Employees and Total Pref. Vet Employees but does not include those reported as Surviving Spouses and Orphans of Veterans. |
| VAR FROM 20% GOAL | % above or below 20% goal for Veterans employed by agency. |
| COMPLAINTS RECEIVED | Veteran complaints received as reported on Veteran Public community & Junior Colleges Form. |
| COMPLAINTS RESOLVED | Veteran complaints resolved as reported on Veteran Workforce Public community & Junior Colleges Form. |